It’s long been known that this hypocrite, and what one commenter called a “relic,” has been adamantly against online poker (and other forms of Internet wagering).
But no, I’m not a hypocrite, Aldeson explains to us, by stating his concerns are as a “father, grandfather, citizen and patriot of this great country…” and later notes that the majority of his “casino profits come from Asia.”
Hey Mr. Patriot, how many Americans are you employing in Macau?
The fatherly Adelson uses the opponents’ standard line of reasoning that children will find a way to place online wagers and that a desperate, debt-riddled society will fall deeper in the hole trying to fill that inside straight.
Will some children manage to sneak in a few bets? Sure. Parents can’t control them every waking moment. But how many kids now view pornographic pictures and violent films online now? Hordes. The Internet is in some ways a wasteland of morass. It’s a Pandora’s box that has been opened, and there’s no closing it. And let’s not forget that people can now play poker, blackjack, slots and much more online in a very unregulated environment. If Adelson really wants to protect the people, including the children, he should push for regulation.
As for that debt-riddled public? A recent report projects U.S. credit-card debt will increase $47 billion this year. Online poker isn’t causing that.
I enjoyed the rebuttal by user Henry428:
One can read through the lines and your attempt to associate being a good father and loyal citizen to the anti-online stance. That’s a little disingenuous. I fought in two wars for my country and feel just as strongly that my government has its place…and its not regulating what it’s citizens can do over the internet, especially when they are causing harm to no one else. Washington doesn’t need to save its citizens from themselves. We need government banning less activities, not more. Don’t ban me from drinking 22 oz. soda and don’t force me to drive 30 minutes to a casino when I can do the same activity online at home.
Adelson promotes his logic citing the jobs that he claims would be lost by land-based casinos. Henry428 notes that it’s possible there could be fewer jobs, but the ones created by online gambling would be for higher-paying technical jobs.
Fewer bank tellers are needed due to the rise of ATM’s yet we don’t outlaw ATM’s.
I’m not convinced we would even see a net decrease in casino-industry employment. Witness the first poker boom created by the rise of online poker and the Moneymaker effect: sites like PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker sent thousands of players to land-based casinos to play in the World Series of Poker, World Poker Tour and other events, and new poker rooms popped up everywhere. Since the PokerStars-sponsored Moneymaker won the WSOP in 2003 the event has grown tremendously.
Already, in Nevada, we’re seeing properties such as Golden Nugget and Stratosphere use their free-play sites to promote their Las Vegas-based casinos by giving away free rooms, meals and show tickets. When others, like Treasure Island (with 888) and Caesars are up and running, I would expect them to do the same. Online poker will allow casinos to market their brick-and-mortar properties to the masses. Who wants to sit in front of their computers when they can experience the real thing?
Adelson talks about how “a person makes an effort to get dressed, join some friends and head to the local casinos for a night of entertainment” as a point of how their behavior can be observed “and ultimately managed by security and other staff if needed.” Realistically, unless someone is so drunk they can’t sit on a slot stool or they are causing a disturbance when does security staff ever stop a person from gambling because they somehow know they’re in over their head? Please, Mr. Adelson.
Everything he argues stands against standard free market principles (and one wonder how many taxpayer subsidies Adelson may have gotten to build some of his casinos). Stop this old-school nonsense, and let the people live their lives.
Nolan Dalla, the longtime poker writer and WSOP mouthpiece, weighed in. I’ll leave you with his post:
Sheldon Adelson is a pathetic embarrassment to himself and the industry he proports to support. He’s a stone ager thinker whether it comes to donating $40 million to Newt Gingrich, blindly supporting Israeli colonialism on the West Bank, or protecting his own self interests as a casino owner. Liar and hypocrite, Sheldon Adelson has nothing to contribute to this important issue.